Monday, February 22, 2010

Why Impressions of Pelléas? Why Now?

Opera Vivente will open a new production of Marius Constant's searing distillation of Debussy's Pelléas and Mélisande Friday, February. Conceived to be accompanied by two pianos, Impressions of Pelléas intensifies the tragedy of the love triangle between two half-brothers and a mysterious princess while evoking the sound world of Debussy's piano masterpieces. It is a chamber opera produced as a chamber opera.


Why do Impressions of Pelléas right now?


A lot of the talk in our industry and in criticism has centered on the question of "How can we keep doing the same stuff we've always been doing for less money"? We must produce yet another Carmen or Traviata or Butterfly, but for half the cost as the last time we did it. To my mind, this almost always results in a production that is unsatisfactory on many levels and is reviewed as such. But we are coming to accept it as the best we can do, after the oft-invoked caveat of "but in the current economic climate…”


To m, the more productive question for the opera industry to be asking is: "What are the elements of opera that are somewhat independent of cost, and what repertoire and production style best focuses us (and our audience) on those elements"?


When I start making a list of those elements, here's what I come up with:


1) Intelligent, musical, singing.

2) Committed, detailed, and skilled acting.

3) Evocative, thoughtful design that serves to enhance the audience's emotional response to the work rather than being an element that steals the audience's attention away from the work. (avoiding the old bon mot of "the audience left the theatre humming the set" in other words)

4) Direct communication with the audience that does not require expensive technology and equipment

5) Direction that places narrative, catharsis, and relevance at the forefront rather than spectacle or concept.


So then the answer to why Impressions of Pelléas now: quite simply, it's a piece that emphasizes all the above elements. I fact, I'd say it's the sort of piece that demands the above elements in order to work.


The musical language of the piece is not one that is all about high notes belted out by some overpaid "star", but rather a marriage of text and tone that is so subtle and intimate that it only comes alive in the throat of a singer who is more interested in artistry and the art form than accolades. The core of the story and the power of Pelleas is its examination of human relationships.


There are no improbable larger than life operatic hero/heroine relationships involving babies tossed in a fire or smugglers, gypsies, and an errant corporal. Instead, there are real human relationships: sibling rivalry between half-brothers, ineffective parents and grandparents, abusive marriages.


The characters of Pelléas tell half-truths, they commit sins of omission, they change their minds, they recognize the error of their ways and yet still persist in them. They delude themselves. Sound familiar? It should, because those are the things that we do. And the hope is that viewing these things on stage gives us the distance required to understand, to empathize, and to achieve catharsis.


Obviously a work of this sort of subtlety needs a number of things to work. For Opera Vivente, these things are presentation in the vernacular, a design concept that is evocative and functiona without being overwhelming, a stage director who is willing to spend the time building those characters with singers who are also willing to be that vulnerable and true to the emotions required of them. And finally, a performance space intimate enough that those singers will feel confident of their efforts being perceived by the audience occupying the same room with them and not only in a close up on an HD screen.


Personally I know a lot of singers, designers, and instrumentalists who will readily tell you that these are the elements that drew them to opera in the first place. So why have we as an industry allowed spectacle, "star" personalities, and a tiny segment of the total operatic repertoire to hogtie us into the belief that big is always best? In the end, does all great opera have to be grand opera?


To get tickets to this truly great opera, click here.


Labels: ,

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I had the misfortune of sitting through two hours of this agony masquerading as opera. The production from begining to end lifts boredom to an new art form. I brought two frinds, who had the good sense to leave. I now doubt whether I will renew my subscription or ever return. A waste of time is the best then can be said about it.

February 26, 2010 7:29 PM  
Blogger Opera Vivente said...

Interesting that Anonymous' comment it posted before the opera even started last night. Makes one wonder if in fact they or their two friends were even at the production. Also, the running time of the opera is 1 hour 40 minutes NOT two hours.

February 27, 2010 5:48 AM  
Blogger LeslieMarqua said...

I don't know what is worse - cowardly anonymous commentary or spelling errors.

That being said, I am compelled to say that it is a beautiful production in all regards. It requires an intelligent audience to pay attention and confront their own feelings in relation to the work.

Kudos to Opera Vivente! - Leslie Marqua

February 27, 2010 6:27 AM  
Blogger KLambrow said...

As one who was actually in the audience last evening, I can only say that I think OV accomplished all of the elements that it set out to. The voices and acting were phenomenal and most importantly, the characters worked together creating a believable and mesmerizing performance. There were moments when I was so angry with Golaud that I wanted to jump on the stage to stop him and to shout to Arkel to intervene. The piano accompaniment was lovely as well, and a refreshing change from the orchestral. The most telling of all for me, is the moment of silence at the end of the performance where one can "feel" the audience emotion in the room. This is the reason I so enjoy opera that is well done - hard to verbalize, but easy to recognize. This performance did just that for me, and judging from others in the audience, for them as well. Baltimore is fortunate to have a company of this caliber. I, for one, am going to see the performance a second time.

February 27, 2010 6:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To set the record straight, my wife and I sat through the entire 1hour and 40 minute production of this dreadfully boring production - as well as the solicitation of donations that was made before the opera began. I e-mailed my comments to you around 10:30 upon returning home. I do not know why my comments were erroneously clocked at 7:29.

My friends, who are music lovers, were there at my invitation, but escaped before the opera ended.

I apologigize for the spelling error in my e-mail; I hope that the Opera Vivente will apologize for the entire dradful production.

February 27, 2010 6:53 AM  
Blogger Opera Vivente said...

Dear Anonymous - Since you clearly are not comfortable revealing your identity in this forum, I would appreciate you contacting me directly (jbowen@operavivente.org or 410.547.7997). Opera Vivente values its subscribers and would welcome the opportunity to repair your opinion of the company. As to apologizing for the "dradful" production, we realize that by presenting a wide variety of operatic repertoire (as opposed to the usual "top 10")we run the risk of occasionally presenting works that are not to everyone's liking. However, a particular audience member's taste does not negate the very high caliber of work that this production represents in both the musical and design realms. To apologize for that would be disrespectful to both the artists and the many audience members who do not share your opinion.

February 27, 2010 7:15 AM  
Blogger KLambrow said...

Isn't it amazing that music lovers at the same performance can come away with such disparate reactions, but we all have our own opinions that require respect. It's well-known that it's impossible to be all things to all people all the time. The thing I admire about OV is it's unwavering dedication to mission. There is nothing wrong with expressing an opinion, but let's just agree to disagree - no need to be nasty about it. Hopefully, yours was the minority opinion.

February 27, 2010 7:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The mature production of "Impressions of Pelleas" is artistic and compelling. The staging of muted tones, spectacular lighting and appropriate costuming reflected a mature, well-funded artistic company. This emotional narrative of conflicted, corrosive and deeply in love souls evolved with intelligently natural pace.
The audience absorbed moments of suspense,sympathy,anger, and revenge balanced by the stunning rendition of Debussy by two fine pianists.
Congratulations and thanks to John for a stunning production.

February 27, 2010 12:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This opera may not be for everyone, but it was brilliantly sung and staged, and the set was gorgeous. This company provides high quality operatic productions that cover the gamut of accessibility, with eminently popular Cinderella and Magic Flute bracketing this piece, which appeals to more of the cognoscenti. OV has something for everyone, and while Pelleas challenges the listener more than other choices, it is a masterpiece well worth producing.

February 27, 2010 8:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I very much enjoyed last night's performance of "Impressions of Pelleas" and John Bowen's pre-performance talk, which made the work more accessible to me especially in terms of its differences from the standard opera repertoire. Lovely music, coherent approach, compelling presentation.

Thank you,
An "O Virgin" but no longer,
James F. Smith ferro_amaral (at) hotmail.com

March 7, 2010 5:41 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home